The guy that flames you in the game trusts his anonymity. He has 2 different characters: online and irl(this is a personality disorder). He thinks his actions wont have any consequences and which pretty much doesnt at the moment. The quality of a person is checked by how he uses anonymity. This is a pretty common technique that has been around. Thats the first part.

Arthur Schopenhauer has a book about arguing with people and he mentions shit talking. It is a tactic thats used when someone has no logical argument left to refer. So you play your tripwires as cypher and kill the enemy with being sneaky. He goes: You loser you have no courage to aim fight. First, hes hurt bcz you outplayed him and he cant control his emotions(impulsive behaviour). Second, he cant find a logical argument to attack which shows lack of IQ. If you play his game you will notice that its a never ending roast session. Whoever says the most honour breaking thing wins which mostly ends up as physical fight irl(which these ppl mostly end up beaten btw). Schopenhauer says: You cant argue with someone that doesnt know logic. So you will never ever break the honour of the toxic c*nt that you encounter bcz he doesnt have one already...

This whole thing applies for both teammates and enemies. A teammate can go 6/16, they already accepted the fact that teammates are random and this can happen just by creating an account. There is no entitlement of being rude bcz of kda.

​

Dont let a primat bring your mood down. You are evolutionally superior than him.

My suggestion is: We can have hardware bans for toxicity, just like cheating. It is not harsh imo. Those primats should know that their actions have consequences. Of course muting is an option but they will keep being toxic in the other games. They wont learn, they have to be penalized.