Posted by Steve
Wednesday, February 3, 2021 4:36 AM
Getting tagged by a classic from 30 meters away and being stopped almost completely is a nightmare. You can't peek for info, if there's a pixel in the smoke or they just happen to be spraying you're stuck in dead water.
I think tagging should slow you much less the less damage you do. A stray classic shot isn't the same as a phantom shot to the chest, tagging allows cheaper worse guns to get free damage and feels incredibly frustrating to lose to.
References
- https://www.reddit.com/r/VALORANT/comments/lacske/tagging_should_be_damage_dependant/
- https://reddit.com/lacske
More Like This
VCT Game Changers, VCT Champions, and VCT Masters trophies compared
Posted by Otto
Tuesday, November 22, 2022 2:55 AM
Aggro peek or Angle hold?
Recently I have been started to aggro peek when I hear an enemy walk up to the angle Im holding, due to the ability to maybe pick of a kill and then retreat.
But I started to question if that is the correct play, over just waiting for the...
Posted by Otto
Tuesday, December 20, 2022 7:57 PM
Most weapon damage ever in valorant?
This was with a bucky, while the enemy was vulnerable due to kj util. One bucky shot has 15 pellets, and 13 of them went to the head while the other two went to the chest. I would love to see how this stacks up against other weapon damages...

Posted by Otto
Tuesday, March 2, 2021 5:19 PM