Posted by Steve
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:02 AM
It seems like the only reason this system could possibly have been implemented would be to promote impulse purchases. What’s the dilemma in allowing people to buy the cosmetic items when they’re available as opposed to an artificially limited rotation?
I suppose technically you could say that about any skin that gets removed after a period of time, but I think it’s within norms to have temporary promotional events (holidays, competitions, etc.)
I’ve seen a few people talk about it but there seems to be a larger population who just immediately accepted this as the new standard with no question as to the moral rationale behind it.
Do you think this is predatory behavior? Is it ludicrous to people that anyone should complain about microtransactions?
Maybe I’m in the minority of people beating a dead horse, but I feel like the community should be keeping gaming companies in check with these sorts of practices.
References
- https://www.reddit.com/r/VALORANT/comments/np60xd/why_is_the_store_system_built_this_way/
- https://reddit.com/np60xd
More Like This
Neon is just a counter for Sage's wall
Posted by Otto
Monday, January 17, 2022 10:36 AM
Me and my friend made a fast and versatile lineups website for Valorant players to learn lineups on the go. No strings attached: it is what it sounds like… a database that lets you shoot any projectile from and to anywhere.
Posted by Otto
Sunday, December 26, 2021 1:00 AM
Riot should play an Experimental queue like Overwatch for experimental agent changes
Posted by Otto
Sunday, December 19, 2021 6:31 PM